• Anti-smacking law insult to Tino-Rangatiratanga

    “That’s some of the reasons why the ACT party stands for the repeal of this anti-smacking legislation, and that’s why I do too,” said Mr Tashkoff Press Release: Friday, 26 June 2009
  • Recent Posts

  • Networkedblogs

  • Recent Comments

  • Christian Blog Topsites

    Christian Blog Topsites
  • Tags

  • Don’t Vote Labour

    www.dontvotelabour.org.nz
  • Unity For Liberty


    Anti-Smacking Petition
    Signature Counter


  • October 2020
    M T W T F S S
    « Aug    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • abort73

    For more information about abortion and what you can do to help, please visit... Abort73.com http://www.abort73.com/
  • Archives

  • Statcounter since February 2008

  • online counter
  • Meta

  • Blog Catalog since May 2008

  • « | Main | »

    Family Integrity #439 — Yahoo poll againt Bradford’s anti-parent law

    By HEF Admin | November 17, 2008

    16 November 2008 Family Integrity #439 — Yahoo poll againt Bradford’s anti-parent law

    Dear Friends,
    Another survey is showing overwhelming opinion against the current anti-smacking law. You too can vote on the poll featuring on the http://www.yahoo.com home page.
    In fact, here are the numbers as of 8.34 am Sunday.
    Today's Poll Are you for, or against the child smacking law?
    Thanks for voting 6602 votes since Nov 14 2008
    All for it 17% 1139 votes
    Definitely against it 80% 5284 votes
    Don’t care 3% 179 votes
    Regards,
    Craig Smith
    National Director
    Family Integrity
    New Zealand
    Ph: (06) 357-4399
    Family.Integrity@xtra.co.nz
    http://www.FamilyIntegrity.org.nz

    Our Home….Our Castle

    Topics: Family Integrity email newsletter, NZ Research and Commentary | 2 Comments »

    2 Responses to “Family Integrity #439 — Yahoo poll againt Bradford’s anti-parent law”

    1. alison wheeler Says:
      March 16th, 2009 at 9:55 pm

      I am, – and ALWAYS HAVE BEEN against the ridiculous, ‘anti-smacking’ bill! To begin with it should have been an Anti BASHING BILL!!
      Removing the parent’s ability to administer a sharp, slightly painful deterrent- has resulted in children having no idea of right or wrong, – and gives them a total lack of respect for Parents, property, other people, – etc!! –I could go on , – don’t have enough time unfortunately!

    2. Mrs Dianne Woodward Says:
      May 17th, 2009 at 5:31 am

      MP Paula Bennett proves she is a woman listening to what Kiwis want as she polled voters in her area in 2007 really upsetting a very vocal Sue Bradford as results clearly showed Majority Mums,Dads, Grandparents agreed with prosmackers Christine Rankin, Dianne Woodward, Simon Barnett on TV3s Campbell Live Smacking Debate 2nd April 2007, Sheryl Savil and Larry Baldocks 2007 legal 390,000 signature Referendum rejecting antismacking law now due for a postal vote July 2009 because Helen Clark ignored our wishes to answer the question last election day. Familyfirst spokeswoman Sue Reid in NZ Herald Report 19th April 2009 questions Family Commission stating smacking = child abuse. Not knowing the other family commissioners names or history means from the 13th to 17th May 2009 only one commissioner Christine has been scrutinized and appears to be a threat to Peter Dunnes desires, Dare I say she could be the only unpolitically correct voice in the team how do the others think or are they told what to believe Rankins opinion ooppps obsolete over or optimistically ongoing oh babies need her voice along with Radio Lives John Tamahere commonsence.

    Comments