http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2009/referendum/ Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:42:01 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2009/referendum/comment-page-1/#comment-1634 Dianne Woodward Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:29:10 +0000 http://familyintegrity.org.nz/?p=997#comment-1634 VoteNO is how the question will be answered by 9 in 10 Kiwis Sue said smacking laws were never about the real issue of child abuse. Suss Sue Reids NZ Herald article out then like me you will definitely decide NO to parents being made criminals for a light smack. Voices of 90% of us will be heard soon in agreement with what Christine Rankin, Simon Barnett and Dianne Woodward said on the 2nd April 2007 TV3 Campbell Live smacking debate still ON the TV3 CAMPBELL LIVE INTERNET webSITE. because Labour Party ignored section 59 identifying what a smack actually is as it does not bruise maime or kill, it is just one quick sharp pain a 30 second reddening of the skin that can correct bad behaviour in an instant. So Sue ignored John Key when he tried to explain this logic to the Labour Party in 2007 they with Sue Bradford ensured we all now must pay the price of 9million$$$ to promote policy NZers never wanted. Act Party tried to reason with commonsence but it feel on deaf ears. Christine Rankin has been ripped to shreds for speaking up for us in saying voteNO. FamilyFirst need our PM John Key to observe overwhelming evidence parents persecuted presently prosecutions proved. VoteNO is how the question will be answered by 9 in 10 Kiwis Sue said smacking laws were never about the real issue of child abuse. Suss Sue Reids NZ Herald article out then like me you will definitely decide NO to parents being made criminals for a light smack. Voices of 90% of us will be heard soon in agreement with what Christine Rankin, Simon Barnett and Dianne Woodward said on the 2nd April 2007 TV3 Campbell Live smacking debate still ON the TV3 CAMPBELL LIVE INTERNET webSITE. because Labour Party ignored section 59 identifying what a smack actually is as it does not bruise maime or kill, it is just one quick sharp pain a 30 second reddening of the skin that can correct bad behaviour in an instant. So Sue ignored John Key when he tried to explain this logic to the Labour Party in 2007 they with Sue Bradford ensured we all now must pay the price of 9million$$$ to promote policy NZers never wanted. Act Party tried to reason with commonsence but it feel on deaf ears. Christine Rankin has been ripped to shreds for speaking up for us in saying voteNO. FamilyFirst need our PM John Key to observe overwhelming evidence parents persecuted presently prosecutions proved.

]]>