<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Family Integrity &#187; News Media/Press Releases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familyintegrity.org.nz/category/news-mediapress-releases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familyintegrity.org.nz</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Commission of Inquiry into Child Abuse Is First Step</title>
		<link>http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/commission-of-inquiry-into-child-abuse-is-first-step/</link>
		<comments>http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/commission-of-inquiry-into-child-abuse-is-first-step/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Media/Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Some child abuse cases in NZ - since Section 59 amended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family First NZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 59]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyintegrity.org.nz/?p=1876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MEDIA RELEASE 
29 July 2010
Commission of Inquiry into Child Abuse Is First Step
‘How many more children have to die before we do something?’
Family First NZ is repeating its call for a Commission of Inquiry into the unacceptable levels of child abuse and deaths in NZ, and says that it will be an important first step [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content"><div class="socialize-in-button"><a title="StumbleUpon" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/commission-of-inquiry-into-child-abuse-is-first-step/&title=Commission of Inquiry into Child Abuse Is First Step" rel="me"><img src="http://familyintegrity.org.nz/wp-content/plugins/socialize/images/su.png"/></a></div></div><h3><strong>MEDIA RELEASE </strong></h3>
<p>29 July 2010</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Commission of Inquiry into Child Abuse Is First Step</strong></span></h1>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>‘How many more children have to die before we do something?’</strong></span></h2>
<p>Family First NZ is repeating its call for a Commission of Inquiry into the unacceptable levels of child abuse and deaths in NZ, and says that it will be an important first step in identifying and targeting the real causes of child abuse.</p>
<p>The call comes following the death of 6 month old Cezar Taylor. More than 20 children have been killed since the passing of the anti-smacking law, maintaining the rate of child abuse deaths that existed before the law change.</p>
<p><strong>“We are tip-toeing around the real issues of alcohol abuse, drugs, declining rates of marriage, increasing levels of violence and sexual content in our media, and welfare which rewards dysfunction,” says Bob McCoskrie, National Director of Family First NZ.</strong></p>
<p>“We must take pro-active action and tackle head-on these difficult issues <strong>as well as mental illness, low maternal age, and other key factors identified by UNICEF and CYF reports</strong>.”</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">“The 88% of voters in the recent Referendum who opposed the anti-smacking law are NZ’ers exasperated with the fact that politicians and government funded groups seem more interested in targeting good parents than tackling these much tougher issues.” </span></p>
<p>“These latest cases are yet another wake-up call that children will never be safe until we are honest enough as a country to identify and tackle the real causes of child abuse.”</p>
<p>“An independent Inquiry free of political correctness and agendas would be an important first step,” says Mr McCoskrie. <a href="http://www.stoptheabuse.org.nz/" target="_blank"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.stoptheabuse.org.nz/" target="_blank">www.stoptheabuse.org.nz</a></p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><strong> <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>HALL OF SHAME</strong></span></strong></h1>
<p align="center"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Since Anti-smacking law was passed</span></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p>1. 16 month old <strong>Sachin Dhani</strong> <em>June 2007</em></p>
<p>2. 28-year-old woman charged with murdering a newborn baby found dead in the backyard of a Te Mome Road property in Alicetown &#8211; <em>June 2007</em></p>
<p>3. 22-month-old <strong>Tyla-Maree Darryl Flynn</strong> <em>June 2007</em></p>
<p>4. 3 year old <strong>Nia Glassie</strong> <em>July 2007</em></p>
<p>5. Ten-month-old <strong>Jyniah Mary Te Awa</strong> <em>September 2007</em> Manurewa</p>
<p>6. Two-month-old <strong>Tahani Mahomed</strong> <em>December 2007</em> Otahuhu</p>
<p>7. 3 year old <strong>Dylan Hohepa Tonga Rimoni</strong> <em>April 2008</em> Drury</p>
<p>8. A 27-year-old Dunedin mother of five admitted infanticide. On May 26 she lost control, banged the baby&#8217;s head repeatedly against the couch, choked her, then threw her on the bed and covered her with a blanket. <em>May 2008</em><br />
<em> </em></p>
<p>9. 7-year-old <strong>Duwayne Toetu Taote Pailegutu</strong>. <em>July 2008</em><br />
<em> </em></p>
<p>10.  16-month old <strong>Riley Justin Osborne</strong> (Kerikeri) boy <em>Dec 2008</em></p>
<p>11. Three-year-old <strong>Cherish Tahuri-Wright</strong> (Marton) <em>Feb 2009</em></p>
<p>12. Five-week-old <strong>Jayrhis Ian Te Koha Lock-Tata</strong> (Taupo) <em>Mar 2009</em></p>
<p>13. One-year-old <strong>Trent James Matthews</strong> &#8211; aka Michael Matthews <em>Jun 2009</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>14. Two-year-old <strong>Jacqui Peterson-Davis</strong> Kaitaia <em>Aug 09</em></p>
<p><em> </em>15. Three-year-old <strong>Kash McKinnon</strong> Palmerston North <em>Aug 09</em></p>
<p>16. Baby death arrest Green Bay <em>26 Aug 2009</em><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.infonews.co.nz/news.cfm?id=41369" target="_blank">http://www.infonews.co.nz/news.cfm?id=41369</a><strong> </strong></span></p>
<p>17. 22 month old <strong>Hail-Sage McClutchie </strong>Morrinsville <em>27 Sep 2009</em> <strong> </strong></p>
<p>18. <strong>Karl Perigo-Check Junior</strong> Wanganui <em>25 Oct 2009</em></p>
<p>19. <strong>13 month old</strong> New Lynn <em>18 Feb 2010</em><br />
<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10626907" target="_blank">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10626907</a></p>
<p><strong> </strong>20. <strong>Infanticide </strong>Waltham <em>18 Feb 2010 </em><br />
Police investigating the death of a baby who was found at a Christchurch address yesterday are looking for the child&#8217;s mother.  <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/3342576/Police-appeal-for-dead-babys-mother" target="_blank">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/3342576/Police-appeal-for-dead-babys-mother</a></p>
<p><strong> </strong>21. <strong>Cezar Taylor</strong> 6 months <em>July 2010</em><em> </em><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong><strong>ENDS</strong><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>For More Information and Media Interviews, contact Family First:</em></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h4><strong>Bob McCoskrie JP &#8211; National Director </strong></h4>
<h1><strong>Tel. 09 261 2426 | Mob. 027 55 555 42 </strong></h1>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/commission-of-inquiry-into-child-abuse-is-first-step/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Ear flick&#8217; case goes to Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/ear-flick-case-goes-to-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/ear-flick-case-goes-to-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Media/Press Releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyintegrity.org.nz/?p=1871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Ear flick&#8217;case goes to Supreme Court
One News July 07, 2010
Christchurch father Jimmy Mason has been given leave to appeal by  the Supreme Court. The 51-year-old was sentenced to nine months  supervision and ordered to undergo anger management courses after a jury  found him guilty of assaulting one of his two children. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content"><div class="socialize-in-button"><a title="StumbleUpon" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/ear-flick-case-goes-to-supreme-court/&title=&#8216;Ear flick&#8217; case goes to Supreme Court" rel="me"><img src="http://familyintegrity.org.nz/wp-content/plugins/socialize/images/su.png"/></a></div></div><h1 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">&#8216;Ear flick&#8217;case goes to Supreme Court</span></span></strong><img style="margin-top: 5px; float: right; margin-left: 5px; width: 182px; margin-right: 0px; min-height: 121px;" src="http://www.familyfirst.org.nz/files/images/content/boys%20on%20bikes.jpg" alt="" /></h1>
<p><em>One News July 07, 2010<br />
</em>Christchurch father Jimmy Mason has been given leave to appeal by  the Supreme Court. The 51-year-old was sentenced to nine months  supervision and ordered to undergo anger management courses after a jury  found him guilty of assaulting one of his two children. The case was  widely seen as a test of the anti-smacking laws as Mason publicly  claimed he&#8217;d done no more than flick his son&#8217;s ear. The Supreme Court  has just announced it will permit him to appeal his conviction on the  grounds that combining two allegations in a single count resulted in a  miscarriage of justice. The two allegations are punching a child and  pulling his ear. <a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/smacking-appeal-goes-supreme-court-3631619" target="_blank">READ MORE</a><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;"><a href="http://www.familyfirst.org.nz" target="_blank"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Family First Comment</span></strong></a>:  This is significant because our original concern with this case was  that a father who admitted an ear flick may have been found guilty of  assault because of the way the charges were applied. We&#8217;ll watch this  one with interest. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><img style="float: left;" src="http://www.familyfirst.org.nz/files/images/content/audio.gif" alt="" /><a href="http://www.familyfirst.org.nz/media_centre/recent_news/news/smacking_appeal_goes_to_supreme_court" target="_blank">HEAR</a> <a href="http://www.familyfirst.org.nz" target="_blank">Family First&#8217;s</a> reaction to the original verdict</span></p>
<p><img style="float: left;" src="http://www.familyfirst.org.nz/files/images/content/submission.gif" alt="" /><strong>Got  a comment on this issue? Email</strong> <a href="mailto:feedback@familyfirst.org.nz" target="_blank"><strong>feedback@familyfirst.org.nz</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/ear-flick-case-goes-to-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mums Still Smacking, Want Law Change not Discretion &#8211; Poll</title>
		<link>http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/mums-still-smacking-want-law-change-not-discretion-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/mums-still-smacking-want-law-change-not-discretion-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Media/Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-smacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CYFs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family First NZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 59]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyintegrity.org.nz/?p=1829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

















MEDIA RELEASE 
31  March 2010
Mums Still Smacking, 
Want Law  Change not Discretion &#8211; Poll
Family First NZ says that almost half of our mums  of young children have admitted smacking illegally in the past 12 months, and  three out of four mums want the government to adopt a law change rather than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content"><div class="socialize-in-button"><a title="StumbleUpon" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/mums-still-smacking-want-law-change-not-discretion-poll/&title=Mums Still Smacking, Want Law Change not Discretion &#8211; Poll" rel="me"><img src="http://familyintegrity.org.nz/wp-content/plugins/socialize/images/su.png"/></a></div></div><table border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="center">
<h3><strong>MEDIA RELEASE </strong></h3>
<p>31  March 2010</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Mums Still Smacking, </strong></span></h1>
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Want Law  Change not Discretion &#8211; Poll</strong></span></h1>
<p>Family First NZ says that almost half of our mums  of young children have admitted smacking illegally in the past 12 months, and  three out of four mums want the government to adopt a law change rather than rely  on police (and CYF) discretion.</p>
<p>These are the key finding of research commissioned  by Family First NZ. The Curia Market Research poll surveyed 1,000 people, and also  found continued confusion over the legal effect of the law.</p>
<p>“This poll confirms that the Prime Minister has not reassured parents. They are  still concerned that he is willing to retain a law which he admits is a ‘dog’s breakfast’, badly drafted, extremely vague, and had to whip his MP’s to support.”</p>
<p>“Immediately following the referendum last year,  polling showed 52% wanted a law change and 27% supported no law change but  greater discretion as suggested by the PM. That has now almost returned to the  80% benchmark of opposition to the law that has been present for the past 5 years.”</p>
<p align="center">_________________________________________________________________</p>
<p align="center"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">KEY FINDINGS</span></strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Extensive support for a law change across all  demographics (4 out of 5 people)</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>3 out of 4 say the law is not at all likely to help  reduce the rate of child abuse</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Only 1/3’rd of respondents actually understand the  law correctly</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>45% of mums of under 12’s have smacked illegally in past 12 months</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>1/4 of mums more likely to vote for political party  that commits to changing law</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>_________________________________________________________________</strong></p>
<p>“A law that requires so many compromises, guidelines, helplines, reviews, and parent education could  be easily fixed with a simple amendment. That’s what parents deserve, what they want, and what the politicians should respect and act on,” says Mr McCoskrie.</p>
<p>As a result of this poll, Family First is continuing to call on the  government to adopt ACT MP John Boscawen’s private members bill which is similar to National MP Chester Borrow’s proposed amendment. National MP’s were supporting this amendment until they were whipped to vote for Sue Bradford’s bill at the last minute.</p>
<p>The poll was conducted between 24 and 28 March 2010  and has a margin of error of +/- 3.2%.</p>
<p><strong>ENDS</strong><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>For More Information and Media  Interviews, contact Family First:</em></strong></p>
<h4><strong>Bob McCoskrie</strong> &#8211; National Director</h4>
<h1><strong>Mob. 027 55 555 42 </strong></h1>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong>Sign up now to received FREE email  updates of issues affecting families – be informed!</strong> <strong><a href="http://www.familyfirst.org.nz/index.cfm/Sign_Up" target="_blank">http://www.familyfirst.org.nz/index.cfm/Sign_Up</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2010/mums-still-smacking-want-law-change-not-discretion-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
