• Anti-smacking law insult to Tino-Rangatiratanga

    “That’s some of the reasons why the ACT party stands for the repeal of this anti-smacking legislation, and that’s why I do too,” said Mr Tashkoff Press Release: Friday, 26 June 2009
  • Recent Posts

  • Networkedblogs

  • Recent Comments

  • Christian Blog Topsites

    Christian Blog Topsites
  • Tags

  • Don’t Vote Labour

    www.dontvotelabour.org.nz
  • Unity For Liberty


    Anti-Smacking Petition
    Signature Counter


  • October 2021
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb    
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
  • abort73

    For more information about abortion and what you can do to help, please visit... Abort73.com http://www.abort73.com/
  • Archives

  • Statcounter since February 2008

  • online counter
  • Meta

  • Blog Catalog since May 2008

  • « | Main | »

    Smacking petition falls short

    By HEF Admin | April 29, 2008

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/4501944a10.html

    Smacking petition falls short

    By TRACY WATKINS – The Dominion Post | Tuesday, 29 April 2008Organisers of a petition to force a smacking referendum have been dealt a major blow after failing to gather enough signatures.

    They now have two more months to collect enough signatures.

    The petition needed 280,275 signatures to force a referendum but fell short after a number were excluded because they were either illegible, the signatory’s date of birth could not be confirmed, or involved people who signed multiple times.

    In a statement, the Office of the Clerk said an audit of signatures found that no more than 269,500 were eligible. That is a shortfall of about 15,500 signatures.

    Family First spokesman Bob McCroskie appeared confident that any shortfall would easily be made up in the two months available.

    He said politicians should respond now, not after the election, to the wishes of parents.

    “The passing of the anti-smacking law by most of our politicians last year was an act of breathtaking arrogance which ignored the wishes of the very people who elected them to represent them in the making of our laws.”

    The petition by Sheryl Savill asked: “Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?”

    If the organisers succeed in collecting the signatures of 10 per cent of eligible electors they will be able to force a referendum at the next election, though its results will be non-binding.

    “““““““““““““““““““““

    If you haven’t signed the petition yet and would like to, please go to www.unityforliberty.net.nz and print it then sign it and send it to the address on the website.

    Topics: News Media/Press Releases | 3 Comments »

    3 Responses to “Smacking petition falls short”

    1. anthony Says:
      April 29th, 2008 at 3:05 am

      i am an enlisted voter and i didnt even see the petition for this i would sign it to let smacking be ok as smacking isnt beating up your child

    2. admin Says:
      April 29th, 2008 at 3:34 am

      Anthony
      You can download the forms here:
      http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2007/make-sure-you-sign-the-petition/
      or here:
      http://www.unityforliberty.net.nz/petition.html

      Then get others to sign the two petitions as well. We have until early May to collect signatures for the second petition and two months from today 29 April 2008 to collect signatures for the first petition. That means we have until 29 June 2008 to collect signatures for the first petition.

    3. Darthen Says:
      August 20th, 2020 at 6:24 pm

      Love this one

    Comments