• Anti-smacking law insult to Tino-Rangatiratanga

    “That’s some of the reasons why the ACT party stands for the repeal of this anti-smacking legislation, and that’s why I do too,” said Mr Tashkoff Press Release: Friday, 26 June 2009
  • Recent Posts

  • Networkedblogs

  • Recent Comments

  • Christian Blog Topsites

    Christian Blog Topsites
  • Tags

  • Don’t Vote Labour

  • Unity For Liberty

    Anti-Smacking Petition
    Signature Counter

  • June 2021
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb    
  • abort73

    For more information about abortion and what you can do to help, please visit... Abort73.com http://www.abort73.com/
  • Archives

  • Statcounter since February 2008

  • online counter
  • Meta

  • Blog Catalog since May 2008

  • « | Main | »

    Referendum Cost Unfortunate Outcome of Political ‘Deafness’

    By HEF Admin | June 28, 2009

    28 June 2009
    Referendum Cost Unfortunate Outcome of Political ‘Deafness’
    Family First NZ is not surprised by a poll today that says that 77% of NZ’ers think the Referendum is a waste
    of money, and says that the government should save the taxpayer $9 million on a postal referendum and
    simply fix the anti-smacking law now as demanded by 80% of kiwis.
    “It is incredible that in the midst of a recession, the government will be spending that amount of money to tell
    them what they already know – that the law should be fixed,” says Bob McCoskrie, National Director of Family
    First NZ.
    “But that is the unfortunate price of ‘political deafness’. The blame for having to even have a Referendum is
    pointed fairly and squarely at the politicians. Even supporters of the Referendum would say that the
    Referendum is a waste of money – but completely necessary in the circumstances.”
    “The Referendum has resulted in a huge amount of time, energy and resources being spent collecting the
    300,000-plus signatures to force the Referendum in the hope that the government would be spurred to amend
    the law and target the real causes of child abuse. Unfortunately they remained deaf.”
    “The law can be easily fixed  by removing the criminality of parents who use reasonable force for the purpose
    of correcting their children.
    “The politicians have tried to paint the Referendum as confusing. They should try explaining the anti-smacking
    law to parents,” says Mr McCoskrie.
    “NZ’ers are crying out for politicians to listen to the voice of the people and to tackle the real causes of child
    abuse, without criminalising and threatening good parents with investigation and interference from already
    overworked police and CYF social workers,” says Mr McCoskrie.
    For More Information and Media Interviews, contact Family First:
    Mob. 027 55 555 42

    Topics: News Media/Press Releases, Referendum | No Comments »