• Anti-smacking law insult to Tino-Rangatiratanga

    “That’s some of the reasons why the ACT party stands for the repeal of this anti-smacking legislation, and that’s why I do too,” said Mr Tashkoff Press Release: Friday, 26 June 2009
  • Recent Posts

  • Networkedblogs

  • Recent Comments

  • Christian Blog Topsites

    Christian Blog Topsites
  • Tags

  • Don’t Vote Labour

    www.dontvotelabour.org.nz
  • Unity For Liberty


    Anti-Smacking Petition
    Signature Counter


  • June 2021
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb    
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    282930  
  • abort73

    For more information about abortion and what you can do to help, please visit... Abort73.com http://www.abort73.com/
  • Archives

  • Statcounter since February 2008

  • online counter
  • Meta

  • Blog Catalog since May 2008

  • « | Main | »

    FI419-Difference between Littlies and LittliesLobby

    By HEF Admin | July 15, 2008

    15 July 2008 – Family Integrity #419 — Difference between Littlies and LittliesLobby

    Dear Friends,
    I need to apologise to the Littlies organisation (www.littlies.co.nz) for confusing them in my last email, #418, with the crowd called Littlies Lobby (www.littlieslobby.org.nz). It was Littlies Lobby who were manipulated by Children’s Commissioner. In fact, Littlies Lobby acts as a conduit for information from Plunket to the Commissioner.

    It is the Littlies organisation, www.littlies.co.nz, who has the poll showing massive opposition still to the law repealing Section 59. Good on them! The poll is still operating, by the way, in case you’d like to vote.

    Regards,
    Craig Smith
    National Director
    Family Integrity
    www.FamilyIntegrity.org.nz
    http://familyintegrity.blogspot.com/

    Our Home….Our Castle

    Topics: Family Integrity email newsletter | No Comments »

    Comments