The anti-smacking law: Only a law change is morally acceptable

From beretta-online
The anti-smacking law: Only a law change is morally acceptable

NZ Prime Minister John Key is saying that he takes the referendum outcome seriously, and that he wants to reassure parents that they will not be investigated or prosecuted just for smacking a child. See the story here.

Police and Child Youth and Family officials will be warned to not prosecute parents for lightly smacking their children.

Prime Minister John Key told the Sunday Star-Times in Sydney yesterday he was planning to introduce “increased safeguards” to prevent parents who gave their children “minor” or “inconsequential” smacks from being either investigated or prosecuted.

The PM claims that he actually supports the view of those who voted no.

Mr Key also told TVNZ’s Q&A programme this morning that he agreed with the result. “I agree and support their view there, I think it would be totally inappropriate for a New Zealand parent to be prosecuted for lightly smacking a child.

Here’s the problem: Their (our) view is that a smack as part of good aprental correction should not be a criminal offence. Unless the law is changed, it will continue to be a criminal offence. To say that it will remain a criminal offence, but police will be advised not to prosecute these criminals, is not to share our view at all.

Criminals should be prosecuted. If a reasonable smack (not a punch, a whipping, a “good hiding,” etc) as part of normal correction should never be prosecuted, then it should not be a crime in law, which it currently is.

Stop being half hearted, Mr Key. If you share our view, as you claim to, that a smack should not be a crime, then seek a law change so that a smack is not a crime. It’s not complicated. We’re waiting.

Leave comments here

Write to John Key and the Cabinet



One response to “The anti-smacking law: Only a law change is morally acceptable”

  1. Judy van Dongen Avatar
    Judy van Dongen

    I am appalled that we as a majority of voters have been ignored. Why on earth would we want to bother casting a vote in a CIR if only to be ignored?
    We are not the people murdering and abusing our children – light smacking is not the cause of these horrific crimes and should not be criminilised.
    The spotlight should sit squarely on those that cause these unspeakable crimes. The government doesn’t seem to want to tackle these issues, rather they prefer to waste everyone’s time investigating light smacking discipline instead! It’s ludicrous and definitely nanny state mentality!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *