Author: HEF Admin

  • Tonight in Gore with Larry Baldock – Tuesday 6 May 2008 7:30pm

    GORE – 6 May
    Tuesday 7.30pm
    Gore Baptist Centre
    23 Ardwick St,
    Gore

    Hi everyone. We are greeting you from the Deep South at the moment. Barb and I are collecting signatures in the main street of Gore today. So far 60 in only 2 hours. Last night was chilly in Invercargill with 8 deg of frost as we slept in the campervan, but after collecting 120 yesterday afternoon in downtown Invercargill and then another 70 in an hour this morning, we are feeling warm all over! 🙂

    The team from Hawkes Bay collected 998 at the women’s expo over the weekend and I know others were out in the rain collecting valuable signatures as well.
    We will finish what we started!

    You may have noticed that update no.26 was dated April instead of May. My mistake. What happened to April is all I can say!

    So that means that the deadline for my petition is next week. Please send as many petitions as you can by Friday by post, and Monday by courier so our team can separate Sheryl’s petition from mine in time for them to be delivered to Parliament on Wednesday.

    Can we do our best this week and this weekend to collect what we can. Thanks

    Warm regards,

    Larry

  • Increase in Abuse of Parents Expected Outcome of Anti-Smacking Law

    MEDIA RELEASE

    5 May 2008

    Increase in Abuse of Parents Expected Outcome of Anti-Smacking Law

    Family First NZ says that the increasing level of parental abuse by their children is an unfortunate but expected outcome of the ideologically flawed and extremist anti-smacking law.

    Recent examples include Nelson police reporting that young people are becoming increasingly violent or threatening towards their parents and that some parents no longer have the confidence to deal with the unacceptable behaviour. Local social agencies in the Bay of Plenty say sibling violence and kids being violent towards their parents are both issues ‘escalating’ in the area. And an increase in both verbal and physical abuse towards parents has been highlighted by youthworkers in the Kapiti Coast.

    “This was a predicted outcome of the anti-smacking law and comes as no surprise to us,” says Bob McCoskrie, National Director of Family First NZ. “The authority of parents has been undermined by this law change, and children are now telling mum or dad they cannot touch them – even when the physical action is reasonable and appropriate to deal with the unacceptable or defiant behaviour of a child. Parents know what works because parents know their kids best.”

    Schools were sold the same ideological myth when they were told that by banning corporal punishment, violence in the community would decrease. In fact the exact opposite happened, with Ministry of Education figures showing that between 2000 and 2004, in primary schools alone, physical assaults on staff were up 40%, assaults on other students 33%, sexual misconduct up 21% and sexual harassment up an astonishing 83%. A New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) survey last year has found one in seven primary school teachers were hit by their pupils last year, and more than 50 per cent of teachers reported “aggressive verbal confrontations” with pupils.

    Sweden, one of the first countries to ban smacking in 1979 suffered a similar fate with assaults by kids increasing 672% in the 13 years following the ban. A recent UN report on European Crime and Safety found that Sweden had one of the worst assault and sexual violence rates in EU.

    “If the government wants parents to be responsible parents, they must firstly respect their authority,” says Mr McCoskrie. “The anti-smacking law has undermined the role of parents, has failed to understand the special relationship and functioning of families, and has communicated to some children that they are now in the ‘driving seat’ and parents should be put in their place.”

    “Parents deserve far better support.”

    ENDS

    For More Information and Media Interviews, contact Family First:

    Bob McCoskrie – National Director

    Mob. 027 55 555 42

    Parents call police over violent kids Nelson Mail 5 May 07

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/nelsonmail/4511256a6007.html

    Parents Threatened by violent children Bay of Plenty Times 28 Nov 07

    http://www.bayofplentytimes.co.nz/localnews/storydisplay.cfm?storyid=3756724&thesection=localnews&thesubsection=&thesecondsubsection

    Rising youth crime in Kapiti Coast TVNZ / Newstalk ZB 20 Mar 08

    http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/1649925

  • Parents call police over violent kids

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/nelsonmail/4511256a6007.htmlParents call police over violent kids

    By KIRAN CHUG – Nelson | Monday, 05 May 2008

    Nelson young people are becoming increasingly violent towards their parents, say police concerned that the passing of the anti-smacking bill could be contributing to a new trend in domestic violence.

    Police say they are receiving at least one or two calls a week from parents who say they are being physically abused or threatened by their children.

    Senior Sergeant Ross Lienert, the Tasman police district youth services and family violence co-ordinator, said some parents were asking police to step in to help them, because they were worried about disciplining violent children.

    There had been a suggestion that the removal of section 59 from the Crimes Act which took away the excuse of reasonable force in disciplining children had “depowered parents, so they’re calling on us to intervene”.

    He said the trend of an increasing number of youths assaulting parents had emerged since the launch of the “It’s Not Okay” campaign to raise awareness about domestic violence, and the almost simultaneous passing of the anti-smacking bill in May last year.

    It was impossible to determine which had made the greater difference, but Mr Lienert said it was positive that more people were contacting police about family violence.

    Police were trying to build a clearer picture of what was driving the increase in youth assaults on parents. They were going through their domestic violence call-out records to gauge the extent of the problem.

    Police would then have a more detailed breakdown of who the offenders were in family violence callouts, including how many children reported being assaulted by their parents.

    More education was needed about the anti-smacking bill but Mr Lienert said parents could still use methods such as “time out” to discipline their children. However, many were unsure of what they could and couldn’t do.

    He also said it was possible that young people were being more violent towards their parents because they thought the anti-smacking bill protected them.

    “Some parents have said, `We can’t touch them, so we’re calling on you to deal with it’.”

    Police were witnessing some “very serious” assaults by young people on their parents, but Mr Lienert said these made up a small portion of the violence.

    However, he said all forms of violence, including verbal threats, were a concern because they could lead to more serious attacks.

    Upper Moutere anthropologist Donna Swift carried out a study of 500 year 10 students in Nelson in 2005, and asked an even split of boys and girls 40 questions.

    She said the results showed that girls were more likely to be physically violent towards family members than boys, and that while 22 percent of girls had hit adults in their family, only 14 percent of boys had done the same.

    Nelson Tasman Te Rito family violence coordinator Gayle Helm said addressing the problem of young people being violent towards their parents was “definitely on the agenda”.

    “It’s a very complex issue and it’s difficult to pin down why it’s happening.”

    The Te Rito network was planning to hold a “youth forum” for community organisations and young people to explore the reasons behind youth violence and how it could be prevented.

    Mr Lienert said police had identified a need for a community-based collaborative programme aimed specifically at targeting the rising numbers of violent young female offenders in Nelson.

    He said Ms Swift had developed a preventive programme, Turning Point, after carrying out a pilot project in Nelson in 2005.

    Police believed it was the only programme of its kind in New Zealand, and was desperately needed in Nelson, he said. Ms Swift said it would require initial funding of $100,000.

  • Tonight Monday 5 May with Larry Baldock in Invercargill

    INVERCARGILL – Monday 5 May 2008
    Monday 7.30pm
    Ascot Hotel
    Cnr Tay St and Racecourse Rd,
    Mararoa Room
    Invercargill

  • South Island Road Trip – beginning tonight Monday 5 May 2008

    Invercargill – Gore – Te Anau – Ranfurly – Timaru – Ashburton –
    Greymouth – Kaikura – Blenheim – Nelson

    Report from Larry Baldock and coming events:

    Hi everyone. There are some good reports coming in of collections over the weekend.

    If you need a link to download the petition forms here it is.

    http://www.thekiwiparty.org.nz/web/pdf/CIR_Petition_form.pdf

    This email is just to let you know where Barbara and I will be over the next few weeks.

    I do not have all your addresses in this data base so I cannot separate out the email to go directly to these locations.

    If these locations are near you we would look forward to seeing you with any friends you may be able to invite along to these meetings.

    We will be able to share the latest on the petition, plus some encouraging developments for the Kiwi Party. We will also have a short 10 min video clip of some of the ‘team kiwi’ members for you to see and time for Q & A!

    Some of the locations do not have details because venues are not finalised. If you can help organise some of these please contact me. Or if you want me to let you know the details when arranged please email me also.

    Even if you do not live in these places perhaps you can email friends or relatives who may be interested.
    Thanks for your support.

    Warm regards,

    Larry

    INVERCARGILL – 5 May 2008
    Monday 7.30pm
    Ascot Hotel
    Cnr Tay St and Racecourse Rd,
    Mararoa Room
    Invercargill

    GORE – 6 May 2008
    Tuesday 7.30pm
    Gore Baptist Centre
    23 Ardwick St,
    Gore

    TE ANAU – 7 May 2008
    Wednesday 7.30pm
    Te Anau Presbyterian
    30 Moana Cres,
    Te Anau

    RANFURLY – 8 May
    Thursday 7.30pm
    May 8
    En Hakkore

    TIMARU – 11 May
    Sunday 7.30pm
    May 11
    New Life Centre

    ASHBURTON – 20 May
    Tuesday May 20

    GREYMOUTH – 21 May
    Wednesday May 21

    KAIKOURA – 22 May
    Thursday May 22

    BLENHEIM – 22 May
    Thursday May 22

    NELSON – 24 May——————————————- note Saturday
    Saturday May 24,
    Kiwi Party Conference
    9am -1pm


    see Website for details.

    www.thekiwiparty.org.nz

  • Anti-Smacking Law, One Year On

    Thanks Andy for reminding us again of this dark moment in New Zealand’s history 12 months ago. Visit Andy’s site to make comments on this:

    http://section59.blogspot.com/2008/05/anti-smacking-law-one-year-on.html

    Anti-Smacking Law, One Year On

    One year ago, on 2 May 2008, Sue Bradford’s Anti-Smacking Bill passed it’s third reading. The bill had the numbers to pass, however the entire National party turned 180 degrees and all National MPs were forced to vote in favour of the bill.

    Just hours before, John Key and Helen Clark had come to an agreement for a “compromise” on the bill. ACT Party leader, Rodney Hide had this to say, on 3 May:

    “I arrived back in the country jetlagged and flew onto Wellington to learn that an historic peace had broken out with Helen Clark and John Key agreeing to a compromise on the smacking bill. Good on John Key I thought. He’s taken the high ground and made a difference. That’s what I thought. Until I saw the amendment. It makes no difference. Of course, the police have the discretion whether to prosecute. If anyone knows that, it’s Helen Clark!! This
    amendment just confirms it and then adds the confusing terms “inconsequential” and “public interest”. – Rodney Hide: “Ammendment makes no difference”

    The ammendment was the new subsection 4 of Section 59 of the Crimes Act, 1961, and reads:

    (4) To avoid doubt it is affirmed that police have the discretion not to prosecute complaints against parents of any child, or those standing in place of any child, in relation to an offence involving the use of force against a child where the offence is considered to be so inconsequential

    However, the ridiculous thing is that this “inconsequential” clause was already a part of the law in New Zealand, and applies to all cases where police are considering prosecution.

    Sue Bradford’s bill to repeal Section 59 of the Crimes act
    Criminalises parents who elect to lightly smack their child(ren) occasionally.

    Everyday mums and dads.

    The bill for repeal passes with

    113 votes for. 93% of the members of Parliament. 17% to 32% of New Zealanders
    Labour, National, Maori, Greens, Progressive, Peter Dunne (United Future), 4 members of NZ First

    8
    votes against. 7% of the members of
    Parliament. 68% to 83% of New Zealanders
    ACT, Gordon Copeland (ex United Future), Taito Philip Field (ex Labour), 3 NZ First, Judy Turner (United Future)



    And on 21 May 2008, the Governor General abandoned his duty of protecting New Zealand citizens from bad law that had managed to get through the parliamentary process – and gave consent to the bill becoming law.

    On Thursday 21 June 2007, the law came into effect.

    New Zealand has not forgotten this dark moment in her history. This will make itself evident at the 2008 election.

    To read the rest and to make comments on this go to:

    http://section59.blogspot.com/2008/05/anti-smacking-law-one-year-on.html