Section 59 {Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Bill}
http://www.parliament.nz…Crimes-Substituted-Section-59-Amendment-Bill.htm
Section 59 {Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Bill}
http://www.parliament.nz…Crimes-Substituted-Section-59-Amendment-Bill.htm
Domestic discipline-“Every parent of a child…is justified in using force by way of correction towards the child, if the force used is reasonable in the circumstances.” Section 59 of the Crimes Act.The Select Committee’s proposed substitution amendment of Section 59 will effectively repeal all parental authority and make all parents criminals by definition, whether they are prosecuted or not.
The aim of this substitution amendment is to remove from parents the legal right to use ‘reasonable force’ to correct their children. Any force used to correct children will, after amendment, fall under the law regarding assault. Assault is a criminal activity. As children cannot be corrected without the use of ‘force’ of some sort, any parent who corrects their child will commit a criminal act by doing so and thus by definition be a criminal.
Sue Bradford does not need another bill to criminalise parents. The Committee’s proposed amendment does that for her. Nor is her claim she does not intend to criminalise parents, credible. The explanatory notes to her bill show that that is precisely her intention. Nor is her claim that police won’t prosecute all parents – as though prosecuting some parents is a matter of no consequence! It is not the prosecution of a person that makes them a criminal, but the person’s committing of criminal acts. Bradford intends to make correcting children a criminal activity, and thus all parents criminals.
Are Parliamentarians so out of touch with reality that they want to turn all parents into criminals? Surely not! However, unbelievable as it may sound, about half of them are!
There is still much more that we want to do to keep the momentum going between now and 2 May, when the Bill might next come before Parliament for its second reading. As we seek to keep up the pressure in our fight against the Crimes Amendment Bill, your prayers, financial contributions and moral support will continue to be most welcome. This bill to repeal Section 59 of the Crimes Act puts parental authority at stake!
http://careycollege.com/documents/By%20Fear%20&%20Fallacy.pdf The repression of reason and public good in New Zealand by the anti-smacking lobby by Michael L Drake
1st reading to repeal Section 59 of the Crimes Act.
Wednesday 27 July 2005
65 MPs for
54 MPs against
Support for 1st reading:
Labour
Greens
The Progressives
The Maori Party
Two of NZ First’s 13 MPs
Significant Quote:
Section 59 of the Crimes Act 1961 currently permits parents to administer moderate corporal punishment to correct their children’s misbehaviour. Various groups contend that corporal punishment should be abolished. It is, they charge, ineffective, if not harmful. They invoke the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in support. Rex Ahdar and James Allan argue that the abolitionists’ case is decidedly weak. The arguments for banning corporal punishment are philosophically suspect, linguistically strained and not supported by the rather limited research evidence. The authors conclude that the present law on parental smacking should remain.
*Faculty of Law, University of Otago.
re. Taking Smacking Seriously: The Case for Retaining the Legality of Parental Smacking in New Zealand
– Rex Ahdar & James Allan*
(Quote taken from this website – http://nzlawreview.auckland.ac.nz/01part1.html)
Hansard – 16 May 2007 – 3rd reading Section 59 |
Hansard – 16 May 2007 – 3rd reading Section 59
Hansard is now up for the 3rd reading:
http://www.hansard.parliament.govt.nz/hansard/Final/FINAL_2007_05_16.htm
or more specifically:
Child Abuse—Child, Youth and Family Discretion
http://www.hansard.parliament.govt.nz/hansard/Final/FINAL_2007_05_16.htm#_Toc167266185
Gordon Copeland— Resignation from United Future
http://www.hansard.parliament.govt.nz/hansard/Final/FINAL_2007_05_16.htm#_Toc167266195
Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Bill
Third Reading
http://www.hansard.parliament.govt.nz/hansard/Final/FINAL_2007_05_16.htm#_Toc167266196
Points of Order
Votes—Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Bill
http://www.hansard.parliament.govt.nz/hansard/Final/FINAL_2007_05_16.htm#_Toc167266198
and
Voting
Correction
http://www.hansard.parliament.govt.nz/hansard/Final/FINAL_2007_05_16.htm#_Toc167266202
Or this link with coloured photos of MPs:
http://theyworkforyou.co.nz/bills/crimes_abolition_of_force_justification/2007/may/16/d01