| 26 June 2008 – Family Integrity #414 — FAMILY FIRST – Please join our call
Dear Friends,
Let me encourage you to please join this call to get some MPs to force the referendum to go though at the same time as the election in November.
There are only 7 MPs to email. A sample letter of what to say and the email addresses are all reproduced below.
Thanks a million.
Regards,
Craig Smith
National Director Family Integrity Ph: (06) 357-4399 Fax: (06) 357-4389 Family.Integrity@xtra.co.nz http://www.FamilyIntegrity.org.nz Our Home….Our Castle |
|
25 Jun 2008
|
Would you consider joining our call…
Call for Majority of Parliament
To Demand Election Day Referendum
Family First Media Release 25 June 2008
Family First NZ has written to the leaders of National, Act, NZ First, United Future and the two independent MP’s asking that they form a majority and require the anti-smacking Referendum to be held on Election Day.
Under section 22AA (5) of the Citizens Initiated Referenda Act 1993, a Referendum can be scheduled for polling day if the “House of Representatives passes a resolution requiring the indicative referendum to be held on the polling day for the general election.”
“That is an ordinary 50% majority vote,” says Bob McCoskrie, National Director of Family First NZ. “ We are therefore calling on National, Act, NZ First, United Future and the two independent MP’s to acknowledge the voice of over 350,000 people and require that the Referendum be held at the most obvious and cost-efficient time of the upcoming election.”
“ Any party that votes against this proposal should have the $10 million that it will cost to do a postal ballot charged against their election expenses ,” says Mr McCoskrie.
“If Sir Robert Muldoon could call a 1984 snap election just four weeks before polling day, and the-then National Government in 1999 take only a week to determine Norm Withers’ petition for a referendum on violent crime would be held on election day, it proves that the Prime Minister’s claim that there is not enough time is a cynical and desparate attempt to sweep the issue under the carpet and undermine democracy.”
If the Prime Minister goes ahead and forces the Governor-General to declare that it be held by postal voting, then the majority of Parliament can still require the voting period to close on the day of the general election – s22AB(6)(b)
“This is second best as it is a completely unnecessary waste of taxpayer money,” says Mr McCoskrie.
JOIN OUR CALL
Email
john.key@parliament.govt.nz
peter.dunne@parliament.govt.nz
rodney.hide@parliament.govt.nz
winston.peters@parliament.govt.nz
gordon.copeland@parliament.govt.nz
taito.phillip.field@parliament.govt.nz
pita.sharples@parliament.govt.nz
View the Act: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0101/latest/DLM318489.html
LETTER
We are asking that you form a majority in the House and require the anti-smacking Referendum to be held on Election Day.
Under section 22AA (5) of the Citizens Initiated Referenda Act 1993, a Referendum can be scheduled for polling day if the “House of Representatives passes a resolution requiring the indicative referendum to be held on the polling day for the general election.”
That is a simple 50% majority vote.
We are asking you and your party to acknowledge the voice of over 350,000 people who have signed the petitions and require that the Referendum be held at the most obvious and cost-efficient time of the upcoming election.
If the Prime Minister goes ahead and forces the Governor-General to declare that it be held by postal voting, then the majority of Parliament can still require the voting period to close on the day of the general election – s22AB(6)(b). This is second best as it is a completely unnecessary waste of taxpayer money.
If Sir Robert Muldoon could call a 1984 snap election just four weeks before polling day, and the Government in 1999 could take only a week to determine Norm Withers’ petition for a referendum on violent crime would be held on election day, it proves that the Prime Minister’s claim that there is not enough time is an attempt to sweep the issue under the carpet and undermine democracy.
The ability to get 390,000 signatures on a petition is a major feat in itself. Please help us uphold democracy in New Zealand.
