Tag: NZ Herald

  • Some Correction Needed, But John Key says it’s OK!

    From Family First NZ

    Some Correction

    Needed



    But John Key says it’s OK!


    Prime Minister John Key and Nigel Latta say the anti-smacking law is working well, that there is no evidence of good parents being criminalised, that Family First has been misled by parents , and that light smacking shouldn’t be a criminal offence .

    So here’s some questions:
    * Why did CYF formally apologise to this family for the way they handled a smacking complaint?
    CYFS says sorry to ‘traumatised’ family
    NZ Herald Jul 31, 2009

    * Why did this parent get prosecuted ?
    ‘I asked for help but instead got conviction’
    NZ Herald Jul 28, 2009 A Wellington solo father says he went to Child, Youth and Family Services for help – and ended up with a conviction for smacking his daughter.

    * Why was this family investigated and referred to a government agency?
    School dobs mum to CYF for hand smack
    Sunday Star Times Oct 28 2007
    * The law (and Plunket / Barnardos / Childrens Commissioner / Families Commissioner) says a smack is illegal . But John Key says its acceptable and shouldn’t be a criminal offence . Who’s correct ?
    “Lightly smacking a child will be in the course of parenting for some parents and I think that’s acceptable,” Mr Key said. Asked if he had just said it was acceptable to lightly smack a child, Mr Key replied “Yes, I think so” and said the law was clear that such matters should not be treated as a criminal offence [that is only true if the smack is not ‘for the purposes of correction’ and is given for one of the permitted reasons. “It’s up to individual parents to decide how they’re going to parent their children. My view is that it will depend on the circumstances and how you want to raise your child,” Mr Key said – Source NZ Herald
    (By the way, we agree!!)
    * Why didn’t the report interview and seek feedback from kiwi parents as to what effect it has had on their parenting?
    * Why didn’t the report address the issue of children dobbing in their own parents , and threatening to report them to the police or CYF?
    * Why didn’t the report address the concern expressed by police and youth workers regarding the increasing rate of assaults by young people on their parents ?
    * Why didn’t the report address the procedural conflict between the smacking law which allows ‘discretion’ versus the family violence policy which demands zero tolerance?
    * Why didn’t the report address why so many cases of what are supposed to be serious ‘assaults’ are receiving inconsequential punishments , and why so many investigations are ending up with a warning and in many cases, no action at all?
    * Why didn’t the report address the effect of criminalising an action (light smacking for the purpose of correction) which most NZ’ers simply don’t believe should be treated as a criminal offence under the law.

    WHY?
    When we get some answers we’ll let you know!

    But please be aware – the latest report does not answer these important questions .

    Have a great week


    Bob McCoskrie
    National Director

    http://www.familyfirst.org.nz/

    Latest Smacking Law Review Offers No Comfort

  • Barnardos Labels Marchers ‘Ignorant’!

    Barnardos Labels Marchers ‘Ignorant’!


    In an incredible outburst, Advocacy Manager for Barnardos Deborah Morris-Travers, who ran the Yes vote campaign at the recent election, has written to the NZ Herald and attacked the upcoming March for Democracy, saying that the march will ” mobilise the ignorant “! This is an example of the lack of respect that some government funded organisations and some politicians and ex-politicians have for the democratic process and the voice of NZ families. It is ironic that Morris-Travers was a Minister of the Crown complements of a change in the voting system from FPP to MMP that less people voted for than voted in the anti-smacking Referendum.

    If you want a reason to march , stand up against being labelled IGNORANT simply because you want a democratic country that listens to the voice of NZ’ers, and you want to tackle real abuse – not real parents.


    March to call for action on smacking referendum
    NZ Herald Oct 27, 2009
    A march to protest the Government’s lack of action following the so-called anti-smacking referendum has been announced today. Colin Craig, an Auckland businessman said the march is about democracy and the government has so far ignored the majority of referendum respondents who voted against the repeal of Section 59 of the Crimes Act. …Family First director Bob McCroskie said his group wanted to tackle “rotten parents” but the repeal of Section 59 was not the answer. “A bad law is still a bad law even if law abiding citizens follow it,” Mr McCroskie said.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10605638
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10605777

    Got a comment on this issue? Email feedback@familyfirst.org.nz

  • CYFS probe traumatises family

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10586993


    CYFS probe traumatises family

    4:00AM Tuesday Jul 28, 2009 By Simon Collins
    Erik was investigated by Child, Youth and Family Services after he smacked daughter Abigail.

    Erik was investigated by Child, Youth and Family Services after he smacked daughter Abigail.

    Your Views Have you changed your habits since the smacking law? Tell us your stories
    The Herald is running a week-long series on the smacking debate. To tell us your stories, go to the Your Views discussion. Or you can follow the debate on our facebook page.

    "After our poll on Saturday we're covering Monday what parents think: TUESDAY: Victims of the law WEDNESDAY: Children have their say THURSDAY: How teachers see it FRIDAY: The official view - police and CYFS SATURDAY: How will politicians respond

    A father says his family were left traumatised and his elder daughter tearful after Child, Youth and Family Services investigated a smack. Parents Erik and Lisa toured the world for years with the Christian theatre group Covenant Players, presenting plays to schools and church groups on themes such as self-esteem, peer pressure, resolving conflict, bullying and addiction. "Before we had children, I read a number of books on strong-willed children by [Christian author Dr James] Dobson and others," says Erik. "In the back of my mind there was the suspicion that those children were not being raised right, that if they had loving parents who were consistent with their discipline, they would turn out to be good kids. Erik said he and Lisa had never had any problems with their elder daughter, who will soon be 13. "And then we had Abigail." Abigail, now 10, "from day one has known exactly what she wanted and been very insistent on getting it". "She will no doubt make a fantastic leader one day," her father said. But right now she's a challenge. "There are times when my wife and I are at our absolute wit's end." Last November, they took her to a child mental health service to get help. Health workers noted a bruise on her back that had been caused by tripping over a vacuum cleaner. Two days later, Abigail had what her father calls "a massive meltdown, banging her bunk against the wall and calling my wife evil". "I said, 'Either your behaviour stops or you're going to get a smack'," he said. "She started kicking at me. I grabbed hold of her ankle and smacked her bottom." Two of his fingers went above the line of her belt, leaving red marks on her back. The smack worked. She stopped kicking and was soon apologetic. But the mental health service was about to give her a full medical examination. Lisa told a nurse about the red marks and the smack. A few days later, at 3pm on a Friday, CYFS staff rang. They had received a claim of abuse and they wanted the children out of the house while they investigated. The parents protested, but were told they had no option. They found friends to take the two girls for the weekend. On the Monday, CYFS spoke to the older daughter at school and left her in tears. Late that afternoon, social workers visited the family, realised there had been a mix-up between the red marks and the bruise from the vacuum cleaner, and closed the case. Far from protecting the children, CYFS made things worse, Erik says. "Abigail went round locking the doors one night because she was afraid someone was going to come and take us. Our eldest would wake up at all different hours and had trouble going to sleep." Erik himself had to take leave from work, complaining to CYFS: "I am angry, have difficulty completing simple tasks, have several times come close to bursting into tears and at least once have actually done so." * CYFS will respond on Friday. Read Big News on this: http://big-news.blogspot.com/2009/07/cyf-boss-apologies-after-parents-go.html