Category: News Media/Press Releases

  • Rising youth crime in Kapiti Coast

    http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/1649925

    Rising youth crime in Kapiti Coast

    Mar 20, 2008 11:24 AM

    Concerns about rising youth violence in families on the Kapiti Coast have prompted officials to start a new initiative to deal with the issue.

    Kapiti police have been called to a number of recent incidents involving young people, including one in which a 16-year-old punched a hole in the wall because he objected to his mother’s rules.

    Youth worker Kerry McGoldrick says she is noticing an increase in both verbal and physical abuse by teenagers towards family members. She says it is particularly distressing for parents and she is urging them to seek help.

    McGoldrick is working to develop a programme in local schools to help teens with anger issues.

  • Smacking petition hits parliament

    http://www.tv3.co.nz/News/PoliticalNews/Smackingpetitionhitsparliament/tabid/419/articleID/47796/cat/68/Default.aspxSmacking petition hits parliament

    Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:02p.m.

    The petition reaches parliament The petition reaches parliament

    video

     

    Opponents of the ‘anti-smacking’ law took the issue back to parliament today, determined to force a citizens’ initiated referendum.

    They say the have gathered the required number of signatures on a petition for the vote to go ahead.

    It took former MP Larry Baldock and 25 others to carry the boxes that were filled with over 600,000 signatures

    Baldock claims one of the two petitions was the largest gathered in 20 years.

    It asks if a smack as part of good parental correction should be a criminal offence in New Zealand. The other asks whether more emphasis should be placed on child abuse.

    Signatures from 10 percent of eligible voters are needed to force a referendum. The signatures on the anti-anti-smacking petition will be checked randomly for legitimacy.

    Baldock says there is still a feeling of concern about the law, which passed last year.

    “We’ve had policemen signing this petition in uniform,” says Baldock. “They are worried in time they are going to have to come back and start arresting the people and prosecuting because at the moment they give a warning, if you continue to do it then you’re going to end up with a prosecution because the law is very clear.”

    The petition organisers want the referendum to be held on Election Day this year, but that is unlikely to happen. The government decides when the referendum would be held and while Election Day is probably the most suitable and cost-effective day, Labour would not want to remind the public of its support for the controversial law.

    More on this story:

  • Smacking petition delivered

    http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/536641/1609488 Petition against smacking laws presented to parliament
       
    Related Video

    Smacking petition delivered (00:34)

     

    Feb 29, 2008 3:49 PM

    The anti-smacking law is back on the agenda with two petitions presented to parliament on Friday that aim to force a referendum.

    And the organiser of the petition says uniformed police officers have been among the more than 600,000 people to sign two petitions organised by Larry Baldock.

    The new Kiwi Party arrived with more than a dozen boxes of signatures calling for the government to address the problem of family violence and child abuse. The other petition asks whether a smack should be a criminal offence.

    Both petitions appear to have the signatures of 10% of voters, making it likely to result in a citizens initiated referendum which would probably be held during the election.

    Baldock says police officers are among those to put their signatures on the petitions because they don’t like the thought of arresting people who have smacked their children. He says it is regrettable that they had to go this far but Sue Bradford knows that her anti-smacking bill never had the support of the people.

  • 600,000 Signatures Demand Smacking and Child Abuse Referendums

    MEDIA RELEASE

    29 February 2008

    600,000 Signatures Demand Smacking and Child Abuse Referendums

    More than 600,000 signatures will be delivered to Parliament today demanding Referendums on the anti-smacking bill and tackling the real causes of child abuse.

    There are two petitions which required 285,000 signatures each, yet the anti-smacking petition alone has received approximately 330,000 signatures – well over the targeted amount.

    “That’s how strong the feeling is on this issue,” says Bob McCoskrie, National Director of Family First NZ. “NZ mums, dads, grandparents and families simply want policies and resources to tackle our unacceptable rate of child abuse in NZ. But they also know that a parent correcting a child with a smack on the hand or bottom is not child abuse, and their actions should not be criminalised.”

    “If kiwis can figure that out, why can’t the politicians?” says Mr McCoskrie. “NZ’ers are not ‘moving on’. They are refusing to lie down on this issue.”

    When Green Party MP Sue Kedgley presented a 39,000 signature petition last year calling for mandatory country of origin labelling on foods, and when United Future’s Peter Dunne presented a 42,000 signature petition last year calling on daylight saving to be extended by 3 weeks, they both said that the government must listen to the voice of the people.

    “These two petitions today each have almost four times the number of signatures of Kedgley and Dunne’s petitions combined.”

    “In response to Families Commission research earlier this month that found that 2/3’rds of parents say that the government doesn’t respect their role, they are going to spend almost $1m to tell parents that they do respect them,” says Mr McCoskrie.

    “Families don’t want an advertising campaign. They want a law change.”

    ENDS

     

    For More Information and Media Interviews, contact Family First:

     Bob McCoskrie JP – National Director 

    Tel. 09 261 2426 | Mob. 027 55 555 42

  • Commissioner Insults Generations of Parents

    http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0802/S00296.htm

    23 February 2008
    Children’s Commissioner Insults Generations of Parents and Grandparents

    Family First is shocked and disappointed by an astonishing attack on the intelligence of New Zealand parents by the Children’s Commissioner.

    The Children’s Commissioner Cindy Kiro has attempted to discredit the huge response to the two petitions asking for a Referendum on child abuse and the anti-smacking law by saying that previous generations of parents didn’t parent as positively and were less qualified in knowing how to raise their children than parents of today.

    “This is an incredible display of arrogance and intolerance from Dr Kiro,” says Bob McCoskrie, National Director of Family First NZ, “and shows the disrespect she has for kiwi parenting. Most parents I talk to often seek advice from their own parents and other parents and grandparents on effective parenting techniques. They acknowledge the wisdom and experience that older parents have.”

    “Dr Kiro has also labelled the hundreds of thousands who have signed the petitions as gullible and misguided, and simply puppets to a political agenda. Once again, this is highly insulting to the more than 300,000 New Zealanders who care about good parenting and have thoughtfully signed the petitions, and is also an insult to the almost 75% of NZ’ers who in a poll this week say that a smack is not child abuse and shouldn’t be a crime.”

    Dr Kiro also claims that police are not knocking on the doors of good parents because of the anti-smacking law, despite many cases to the contrary.

    “This latest outburst shows how hostile the Commissioner is to anybody who disagrees with her intellectual and superior insight on parenting and families, and confirms the irrelevancy of the office,” says Mr McCoskrie.

    ENDS

  • “Why the panic?”

    Comments from Ruby Harrold-Claesson after reading the article “A referendum? Why the Panic?”

    “Why the panic?” asks Barnardos CEO.

    I would also like to ask “Why the panic?” when the NZ parliament refused to listen to the overwhelming majority of the population that was against the passing of the anti-smacking law in every possible poll; I would also like to ask “Why the panic?” when the NZ parliament forced the MPs to vote according to party lines instead of their own consciences; I would also like to ask “Why the panic?” to pass the law instead of giving the NZ parliament the possiblity to examine the Swedish court verdicts that I presented at the hearing.

    Intelligent and caring people can’t think that it is acceptable to let this dangerous law work for two years and then review it. Who is going to clean up the damages done to children and their parents while the govt is waiting to review the law? Barnardos? The PM and her govt? Sue Bradford? Typically, they can make a mess, but they can’t clean up the mess they make.

    If this law had been passed in sound, democratic order and due process there would be no need for a referendum today. The PM, Sue Bradford and the other dictators are afraid of that there will be sufficient numbers for a referendum – there may be more than enough already – and most of all they are afraid of the result of a referendum on the anti-smacking law.

    Keep up the good work

    All the best
    Ruby Harrold-Claesson

    Sweden
    Attorney-at-law
    President of the NCHR/NKMR
    http://www.nkmr.org

    Comments based on this article:

    http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0802/S00258.htm

  • Media-Family First

    MEDIA RELEASE

    19 February 2008

    Smacking Research Confirms Huge Opposition to Anti-Smacking Law

    Family First NZ is not surprised by the findings of a Research NZ poll which has found continued massive opposition to the anti-smacking law.

    According to the poll, 74% believe that parents should be able to smack children – an equivalent rate to 12 months ago (73%) when a similar poll was done.

    “This is consistent with all other polling which has averaged around the mid 70’s low 80’s percent opposition to this extremist law,” says Bob McCoskrie, National Director of Family First NZ.

    “These 74% of NZ’ers are not the ‘thrashers and bashers’ of children as suggested by the Prime Minister. They are not condoning child abuse as offensively implied by supporters of the law. They are teachers, social workers, mums and dads, grandparents, police officers, school principals, early childhood educators, doctors, counsellors, and youthworkers who simply know that a smack is not child abuse, and that good parents should not be criminalised in their efforts to raise law-abiding and responsible citizens.”

    “The so-called compromise has quite clearly given parents no confidence or certainty.”

    “Last week the government announced $800,000 to tell parents that they are valued. 74% of parents would prefer a law change to an advertising campaign,” says Mr McCoskrie.

    Family First calls on all politicians to acknowledge the voice of NZ parents and to amend the law to that proposed (and consistently supported) by MP Chester Borrows so that light smacking is not a crime in NZ.

    “It is also ironic that this poll has been released the same day as a book entitled ‘Unreasonable Force’. The huge majority of NZ’ers are rejecting the reasonableness of this anti-smacking law,” says Mr McCoskrie.

    ENDS

      

    For More Information and Media Interviews, contact Family First:

     Bob McCoskrie JP – National DirectorTel. 09 261 2426 | Mob. 027 55 555 42

  • Anti-smack minister smacked own kids

     http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23179051-421,00.html

    By Clare Masters and Simon Benson

    February 08, 2008 01:46am

    Article from: The Daily Telegraph

    THE minister whose disgraced department broke up a family because a grandmother smacked her grandson has admitted he smacks his own children.

    The startling admission by embattled Community Services Minister Kevin Greene also puts the father of six in direct conflict with his own department’s rule, which is that children should never be smacked.

    The child protection sector is in an uproar following yesterday’s revelation by The Daily Telegraph that children had been removed from their grandparents’ home because the grandmother smacked her six-year-old grandson for playing in a stormwater drain.

    They were official DOCS carers and had looked after the three brothers and sister several times in the past six years.

    Despite DOCS listing smacking as a “risk of harm” offence that must be reported, Mr Greene said spanking could have its place.

    “My wife and I have raised six children together. Three are now adults, two are in their late teens and our youngest is 12,” he said.

    “There were times when our judgment has been that it was appropriate to smack the children. But we’ve moved past those days of toddler tantrums and disobedient kids.”

    Mr Greene also said he supported the law in NSW that allows smacking but outlaws excessive physical punishment.

    “While discipline is a personal judgement for parents, one thing is paramount – the child’s health and safety should never be threatened by the course of action parents take.”

    Foster care workers yesterday were asking how DOCS can punish foster carers for doing something their own minister has condoned.

    “It puts a lot of confusion in carers’ minds when he is saying, ‘Do as I say, not as I do’,” Foster Care Association president Mary-Jane Beach said.

    “Some carers would agree that an occasional smack on the bottom doesn’t hurt and they find the department’s no smacking stipulation difficult. Why would you give a mixed message like that?”

    The woman whose grandchildren have been taken away from her was furious at the apparent contradiction.

    “It is like the rich and the poor; you have one set of rules for one and one for another,” Catherine (not her real name) said.

    “It was just to teach our grandson about getting down the drain.

    “If it’s good for him (Greene) why isn’t it good enough for the other parents and grandparents who only do it when a child mucks up?”

    The fresh controversy comes amid calls to elevate the Community Services – currently a junior portfolio – to a senior Cabinet position.

    Mr Greene is a first-time minister accused of being out of his depth in his handling of recent child death cases.

    Andrew McCallum, from the Association of Children Welfare Agencies, said DOCS was not given enough importance by the Government.

  • Hundreds sign smacking petition at Manukau’s Waitangi event

    7 Feb 08Hundreds sign smacking petition at Manukau’s Waitangi event

    Hundreds of South Auckland residents signed the anti-smacking petition at Manukau’s Waitangi Family event yesterday, bringing the national tally closer to its goal.

    Leader of the Family Party, Richard Lewis, says his team collected nearly 1300 signatures from South Auckland residents concerned about Labour’s controvercial, anti-family legislation.

    “We were inundated with people wanting to sign the petition because they believe most parents know the difference between a smack and abuse. This community overwhelmingly rejected the anti-smacking bill before it was passed into law and that sentiment is still strong today. Many people had previously signed the petition through their church or the Unity for Liberty group, which was very encouraging,” he added.

    The Family Party aims to reinstate Section 59 of the Crimes Act, which protects parents from criminal liability if they smack their children in reasonable and appropriate circumstances.

    “Parents need the ability to be able to set and enforce boundaries in the home. If they don’t, society pays the price and we’re experiencing that in our communities today with the increase in youth gangs and violent crime,” he added.

    Richard Lewis is standing for the Manukau East electorate in the coming election.

    ENDS

    THE FAMILY PARTY
    http://www.thefamilyparty.org.nz

  • Families Commission Needs to Get ‘Respect’ Message to MPs

    MEDIA RELEASE

    7 February 2008

    Families Commission Needs to Get ‘Respect’ Message to MPs

    Family First NZ is welcoming a call by the Families Commission for NZ’ers to do more to show they support and value parents.

    “But ultimately, this needs to come from the top-down,” says Bob McCoskrie, National Director of Family First NZ. “Parents are currently, and understandably, feeling undervalued, under-resourced and under suspicion.”

    “For too long, laws have been passed and policies pushed that have undermined the role of parents. These have been advocated by the Children’s Commissioner, NZ’s blind adherence to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and politicians. Unfortunately, the Families Commission has, to this point, failed to represent the voice of parents, evidenced by their support of the anti-smacking bill.”

    Recent examples of undermining the role of parents include:

    * a teenager who attempted to use the Care of Children Act to ‘divorce’ her parent because she didn’t like the family rules

    * the Privacy Act being quoted by the Police as justification for hiding the whereabouts of a 16 year old runaway daughter from her concerned parents

    * CYF and Police failing to prosecute a 21 year old who admitted having sex with a girl under the age of 12

    * the anti-smacking law which sent a clear message to parents that the State and its agencies know better how to raise children even if parents are reasonably and responsibly correcting their children.

    * continued lack of an independent CYF Complaints Authority despite repeated calls for one and an increasing number of families being adversely impacted by the actions and decisions of social workers (acknowledged by a recently released book by senior social workers) without an avenue of appeal for the parents

    * children as young as five have been told off for bringing yoghurt, muesli bars, salad rolls and juice to school as over-zealous teachers try to enforce healthy eating rules – despite parents pleading to be allowed to give their children the occasional treat

    * parents concerned about the graphic nature of information regarding the meningococcal B campaign provided to children at school, mostly without consent (study published in the New Zealand Medical Journal)

    * proposal by the Children’s Commissioner to screen every child’s home, threatening to refer good parents who resist this intrusion, to social welfare agencies, while failing to target the real abusers and provide the necessary services for young and new parents

    * young girls (some well under the age of sexual consent) being sneaked off by schools to get contraceptives or an abortion without any parental knowledge or consent yet these same kids have to get parental permission to go on a school trip to the zoo

    “If the government wants parents to be responsible parents, they must firstly respect their role.”

    Family First hopes that the Families Commission will take their message of supporting and valuing parents to the law and policy makers.

    ENDS

    For More Information and Media Interviews, contact Family First:

    Bob McCoskrie JP – National Director

    Mob. 027 55 555 42