Important climate change articles Dr Geoff Downes – Christianity Scripture and Climate Change Mr Trev McCallum – Climate change – one world government |
Year: 2009
-
Important climate change articles – Copenhagen treaty
-
Father found guilty of 11-week-old’s murder
Hall of Shame:
Father found guilty of 11-week-old’s murder
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/3034435/Father-found-guilty-of-11-week-olds-murder
A South Auckland man accused of starving, beating and finally killing his 11-week-old daughter has been found guilty of murder.
The 12 day trial for Azees Mahomed, 31, and his wife Tabbasum Mahomed, 26, came to a close at Auckland’s High Court yesterday morning.
The six-woman and five-man jury deliberated for five hours before returning the unanimous verdicts this morning.
The couple’s daughter, 11-week-old Tahani Mahomed, died in Auckland’s Starship Hospital on New Years Day, 2008, after she arrived at Middlemore Hospital on December 28, 2007, with severe head injuries.
Azees Mahomed was found guilty of murdering Tahani.
The jury also found him guilty of two charges of grievous bodily harm – which relate to breaking his daughter’s leg and giving her a head injury so severe it caused brain damage between October 7 and December 26, 2007 – and one count of failing to provide the necessaries of life.
Tabbasum Mahomed was found guilty of one charge of failing to provide the necessaries of life.
Justice Harrison thanked the jury for their service in “a particularly difficult and traumatic trial”.
“The circumstances have been extraordinary and traumatic.”
The jury forewoman broke down in tears after delivering the verdict.
Justice Rhys Harrison summed up the case yesterday morning, telling the jury that given the tragic circumstances of baby Tahani’s death it was “only natural” if they had felt an “emotional response” during the trial.
“However I ask you when you sit down in the jury room to put those emotions aside and focus purely on the evidence.”
The burden of proof lay with the crown and the jury would have to be sure that each charge had been proven beyond reasonable doubt, Justice Harrison said.
On the opening day of the trial crown prosecutor Philip Hamlin had told the jury the South African born couple had treated their young daughter with “systematic neglect and violence”.
Tahani had been born healthy and of a good weight on October 7, 2007, but, just over two months later, lay dead, Mr Hamlin said.
“In 11 weeks, baby Tahani has been neglected and not fed.
“In 11 weeks, baby Tahani has been left in a hot car for hours.
“In 11 weeks, baby Tahani has brain injury from the first injury she suffered.
“In 11 weeks, baby Tahani was the victim of the second and fatal head injury,” Mr Hamlin told the jury.
The Crown alleged Tahani was murdered by her father when her head was “slammed against a very hard surface, twice”.
The second blow to head had been of such violence the child never recovered, Mr Hamlin said. Azees Mohamed was also responsible for pulling the baby’s left leg so hard it broke her shin bone, he said.
When the parents finally took their daughter to hospital on December 28, 2007, she was gravely ill, the court heard.
The doctor who examined Tahani when she arrived at Middlemore Hospital described her as severely “malnourished”, estimating her weight to be only 4 kilograms.
Mr Hamlin said that, when the Mahomeds had arrived at the hospital, they had told medical staff “they could not understand how or why the baby was in such a critical condition”.
Detective Senior Sergeant Dave Lynch of Manukau police said he was pleased with the outcome.
“It was clear very early on in the investigation that these were non-accidental injuries and there were only two people who could have inflicted them.
“I’d like to pay tribute to the investigation team and the Crown prosecution team for getting this result today.”
Police bugged the Mahomed’s home after the incident, and the intercepted taped conversations were played to the jury during the trial.
These tapes were very useful to police during the investigation, Mr Lynch said.
In the taped conversations, the couple could be heard praying to Allah and talking about how the infant could have been fatally injured.
The Mahomeds were remanded in custody until sentencing on December 15.
-
Should politicians have to listen to you?
Please feel free share this information
OPEN LETTER
DEMOCRACY
Should politicians have to listen to you?
The politicians have a bad track record with citizen’s initiated referendums..
o In 1999, 82% of NZ’ers said the number of MP’s should be reduced to 99 – the politicians ignored it
o In 1999, 92% of NZ’ers said that the needs of victims should have greater emphasis, restitution and compensation should be provided, and there should be minimum sentences and hard labour for all serious violent offences – in response, the politicians reduced parole eligibility to 1/3’rd of sentences, instructed judges to impose the least restrictive sentence, and have made unenforceable token gestures towards victims
o In 2009, 87.4% said that a smack for the purpose of correction should not be a crime under the law – the politicians ignored it
o And some people believe that we need a referendum on the proposed Auckland ‘Supercity’ because of the major changes it makes to the form of citizen representation.
It’s about time the politicians got the message!
As you know, we are working with businessman Colin Craig on the March for Democracy www.themarch.co.nz
Colin Craig has been quoted as saying that he finds it “ deeply disturbing that such a clear message from the people of this country to government has been ignored. My forefathers fought for a democracy and in a democracy the government does not pass and retain laws that nearly 90% of the people don’t want. It is my turn to help fight for the rights of ordinary New Zealanders.”
Colin isn’t just talking. He’s putting his money where his mouth is. And we need to get in behind him.
As you can see, the purpose of this March goes even further than just the anti-smacking law. When NZ’ers and families speak with such a loud and united voice, as they have on these issues, the politicians must not be allowed to ignore them. It is significant that politicians are willing to accept democracy when it is to their benefit (i.e. getting elected!) but are willing to blatantly ignore it when suits their political agenda.
The March is not a one-off – it is part of a long term strategy to bring representative democracy back to NZ
Ironically, it appears that political parties are keen to accept petitions in their favour – United Future on daylight saving , Labour on night-classes – and they also support Referendums – National on MMP , Labour on the Auckland SuperCity , and the Greens on the Monarchy – but when it’s a Citizen’s Initiated Referendum, they suddenly go deaf!
When the law was passed in 1993 allowing referendums to be initiated by the people, senior National MP Sir Doug Graham said “..it will be obvious that, if the public overwhelmingly supported a proposition contained in a referendum, clearly it would have great persuasive weight and any Government that simply ignored it would do so at its peril .”
PLEASE MARK 1.30pm SATURDAY 21 NOVEMBER (meeting at the bottom of Queen St Auckland) IN YOUR DIARY – AND MARCH FOR DEMOCRACY!
More details will be added to the website over the next couple of weeks www.themarch.co.nz
Thanks for your consideration.
Kind regards
Bob McCoskrie
National Director